I chose not to name the "author," blogger, or whatever he is that attempted to malign Jamiel Shaw on the internet in my previous post.
That's because I don't want to provide the individual with even one iota of additional publicity. I hope his website fails, and maybe it will, though clearly he is being paid by special interests who want to harm Jamiel's reputation to help their own greedy, at-best amoral cause masquerading as exploitation "compassion" for undocumented workers.
So if you object to someone's behavior, attitude or lack of morals, don't name them if you are writing about them, or on subjects that could be related to them. For example - the woman who encouraged her teen daughters to pose as a fake MySpace teen to deceive Meghan Meier, who became so distraught at the fake boy's internet abuse, she hung herself. No more attention for her - I'll shun her in cyberspace the same as she was shunned in real life.
As another example, some people use tricks to make their poorly-written, moronic inter-spewings appear higher in Google searches than would be appropriate under ordinary circumstances. One dumb blog has hundreds of "tags" -- certainly more than its "content" (and I use that term loosely).
If you see this cheap trash, just ignore it. I select carefully who and what I cover -- and now I'm formalizing my policy. If I don't like what you do, how you do it -- and above all, feel that you are abusive of others, either by taking economic advantage of them, or you're just a bottom-feeding piece of stinking biofilm, I'll be intershunning you. And I hope others will follow the same procedure as well in cases where they also disapprove. Remember, you can cover the issue -- you don't need to give those who feed off negative attention any extra energy.